In Response to Caroline Glick’s Arutz Sheva Article: “Why Oslo Still Rules” I answer that –
“Oslo is a Myth”
Let’s look at the law and the facts:
Fact: Jews have never abandoned Eretz Yisrael but rather have maintained a continuous presence in Eretz Yisrael for more than 3,500 years.
The Law recognizes that where “a First Nation maintains demographic and cultural connections with the land, aboriginal title (including self-government rights) can survive both sovereignty changes and the influx of a new majority population, resulting from foreign conquest.”
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia,  3 SCR 1010 (Case Number 23799).
Fact: Since Jews have never abandoned the Kingdom of Eretz Yisrael but rather, (in spite of being ethnically cleansed from their homeland) have prayed for the restoration of the Throne of David, and maintain aboriginal title to all of Eretz Yisrael, Jewish sovereignty extends to all Jewish Tribal Territories, both East and West of the Jordan River.
Fact: By the terms of Articles 5, 15 and 25 of the Mandate for Palestine, the Hejaz Hashemites were unlawfully established by the “Mandatory” [The UK] as a foreign power over Sovereign Jewish Territories.
Since the “Mandatory” willfully violated the terms of the Mandate for Palestine, and agreed to be “responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be…,” it must be held accountable and provide reparations and restitution to the Jewish Community.
Let’s look at those terms:
The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.
Abdullah I was a subject of the Kingdom of the Hejaz when he was made “Emir” of “trans-Jordan” – As such “Palestine” territory was placed “under the control of a Government of a[ny] foreign Power.” in violation for the Mandate for Palestine.
The Mandatory shall see that complete freedom of conscience and the free exercise of all forms of worship, subject only to the maintenance of public order and morals, are ensured to all. No discrimination of any kind shall be made between the inhabitants of Palestine on the ground of race, religion or language. No person shall be excluded from Palestine on the sole ground of his religious belief.
Since “Palestine” was defined as being territory on both sides of the Jordan River, it was unlawful, as a violation of Article 15 for the Mandatory (UK) to issue the infamous “White Paper” of 1939.
In the territories lying between the Jordan and the eastern boundary of Palestine as ultimately determined, the Mandatory shall be entitled, with the consent of the Council of the League of Nations, to postpone or withhold application of such provisions of this mandate as he may consider inapplicable to the existing local conditions, and to make such provision for the administration of the territories as he may consider suitable to those conditions, provided that no action shall be taken which is inconsistent with the provisions of Articles 15, 16 and 18.
What were the “territories” referenced in Article 25? Why, the Jewish Tribal territories of Gad, Reuven and Manasseh. See the G. Adam Smith Bible Atlas of the Holy Land.
During the Paris Peace Conference, British PM, Lloyd George gave Georges Clemenceau a memorandum which said that British Palestine would be “defined in accordance with its ancient boundaries of Dan to Beersheba“.
What does the terms postpone or withhold mean, except for a temporary provision?
And finally, what does the phrase: “for the administration of” mean, except for an “administrative” power? Certainly, in light of the raison d’etre of the Mandate for Palestine being the “National Home of the Jewish People;” the phrase “for the administration of” cannot mean a grant of “sovereignty” to a foreign power.
Because the terms of the Mandate for Palestine were violated by the Mandatory (UK), the Hejaz Hashemites are an unlawful foreign power illegally occupying Sovereign Jewish Territories!
Fact: There are no “Palestinians” – The Arabs, (after having installed Abdullah I as their sovereign at the Jericho Conference of December 1948,) led by Yasser Arafat in 1970 tried to overthrow the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. For this “Black September” PLO “operation” the Arabs of the PLO Faction gained popularity.
There are Arabs residing in Eretz Yisrael both East and West of the Jordan River. In 1977, Zuheir Mohsen, PLO Executive Council member, articulated the goals of the new “people-hood” strategy saying, “The Palestinian people does not exist…. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the State of Israel…. It is only for political and tactical reasons that we speak today about…the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism.”
Fact: PLO Chairman, Yasser Arafat, after signing the Oslo Accords called for Jihad to Liberate Jerusalem:
And long after this agreement (1993 Oslo Agreement) which is the first step and not more than that, believe me. There is a lot to be done. The jihad will continue and Jerusalem is not for the Palestinian People. It is for all the Muslim Uma, all the Muslim Uma. You are responsible for Palestine and for Jerusalem before me.
In addition to calling for the jihad on Jerusalem, Arafat also compares the unpopularity of the agreement with Israel among Muslims with the Hudaybiyyah Treaty signed by Muhammed in 628. Yasser Arafat South African Speech of 10 May 1994.
The Law states that for an agreement to be valid, the parties must come to terms with full disclosure of the facts and in “good faith” – means that both parties intend to comply with the terms of the agreement “in good faith” –
“Good faith” has generally been defined as honesty in a person’s conduct during the agreement.
Fact: The PLO admitted “after the fact” that the Oslo Process was a “Trojan Horse” – To quote from Glick’s Arutz Sheva article:
“Faisal Husseini, who held the Palestinian Authority’s Jerusalem portfolio, gave an interview shortly before his death in the summer of 2001 in which he exposed the fraud at the heart of the Oslo process. Speaking with Al Araby newspaper, Husseini said that Yasser Arafat, his deputies and henchmen never saw the “peace process” as a way of achieving peace with Israel. Oslo, for them, was a means to advance their goal of destroying Israel, “from the river to the sea.”
Husseini described the Oslo process as a “Trojan Horse.” Arafat and his people were the hostile army that infiltrated the city “in the belly of the wooden horse.” When Arafat rejected Palestinian statehood and peace at the Camp David summit in July 2000 and initiated the Palestinian terror war two months later, it was as if he and his men had exited the horse and begun the fight.
“This is the beginning of the real work,” Husseini explained.”
Because the Olso Process was never entered into in “good faith” by the PLO, it is a null and void agreement – A Myth.